快捷搜索:  汽车  科技

杜蕾斯因为什么广告被罚(杜蕾斯微博被罚81万)

杜蕾斯因为什么广告被罚(杜蕾斯微博被罚81万)The advertisement should serve as a reminder to all commercial campaigns that advertising about sex might be okay but encouraging one-night stands is a strict no-no.More than hinting at sex the advertisement drew criticism for alluding to people's private parts. The administration's order clearly listed the procedure for paying the fine while also saying the company could apply for a hearing if

收录于话题

导读

杜蕾斯官方微博因去年4月19日的一则广告被罚81万,今天又冲上了热搜榜。有些网友为杜蕾斯叫屈,但看看他们惹事的广告文案,或许你不会这么想。

Durex a well-known condom brand is at the center of online discussions over a fine imposed on its micro blog for a risque advertisement.

The Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation fined the company running its official microblog 810 000 yuan ($120 509) in December but the issue became public knowledge on social networking sites only on Thursday. Many users defended Durex saying that a condom producer has the license to sex up its advertisements.

However a closer look at the administration's order shows that the advertisement company was penalized not for mentioning "sex" but for breaking some social norms while collaborating with fast food delivery brand ele.me milk tea brand Heytea and cinema ticket sales platform Taopiaopiao on April 19 2019. The idea was to market the date 4.19 or "four one nine" as "for one night" thus encouraging people to have a one-night stand.

杜蕾斯因为什么广告被罚(杜蕾斯微博被罚81万)(1)

Besides the content Durex used in advertisement posters is quite suggestive. Advertising with the milk tea brand it lured customers saying "Not a single drop left" but it was obvious it was hinting at a man's semen. The poster with ele.me said "Tonight we feed every mouth" leaving no one in doubt that the mouth here referred to the female genital organ. The poster with Taopiaopiao screamed "Tonight just go into that secret corner" giving no prizes for guessing what was implied.

杜蕾斯因为什么广告被罚(杜蕾斯微博被罚81万)(2)

More than hinting at sex the advertisement drew criticism for alluding to people's private parts. The administration's order clearly listed the procedure for paying the fine while also saying the company could apply for a hearing if it disagreed with the decision. That the latter did not apply means it accepts it has gone too far this time and there is no reason to blame the administration.

杜蕾斯因为什么广告被罚(杜蕾斯微博被罚81万)(3)

The advertisement should serve as a reminder to all commercial campaigns that advertising about sex might be okay but encouraging one-night stands is a strict no-no.

Click here for audio and translation of the story

杜蕾斯因为什么广告被罚(杜蕾斯微博被罚81万)(4)

来源:CHINADAILY

猜您喜欢: