接收论文的审稿意见怎么写(5步法有效回复论文审稿意见)
接收论文的审稿意见怎么写(5步法有效回复论文审稿意见)The yellow part that has been revised according to your comments. Revision notes point-to-point are given as follows:Thank you for your decision and constructive comments on my manuscript. We have carefully considered the suggestion of Reviewer and make some changes. We have tried our best to improve and made some changes in the manuscript.在回复的第一步时要写几句感谢的话保持态度端正有礼貌,感谢审稿专家审阅稿件花费的时间和精力,感谢编辑部的辛勤付出。
很多同学在论文投稿收到审稿意见后很恐慌,生怕自己一个不小心就阻碍论文的顺利发表。摆正心态!威廉斯塔福德诺布尔的《答复审稿人的10条简易法则》中提到:审稿过程能让你获得同领域多位专家的建议,可以大大改进你的内容。这对你的研究来说是百利无一害的!
而且,经过多轮同行评审的论文容易获得更多引用。
因此,大家应该把它当作一件和大牛们沟通的好事,不要当作别人给你稿件提意见的「坏事」。
为了更好的沟通,可以参考以下建议和回复模板:
STEP-1: 万能开头,礼貌谦和在回复的第一步时要写几句感谢的话保持态度端正有礼貌,感谢审稿专家审阅稿件花费的时间和精力,感谢编辑部的辛勤付出。
然后可以写上一些「套话」说明你已阅读审稿意见,同时我们并对文章进行了认真的修改等:
Dear reviewer:
Thank you for your decision and constructive comments on my manuscript. We have carefully considered the suggestion of Reviewer and make some changes. We have tried our best to improve and made some changes in the manuscript.
The yellow part that has been revised according to your comments. Revision notes point-to-point are given as follows:
STEP-2: 逐条回答,不可遗漏面对审稿意见我们要逐一进行回复,详细说明修改原因,如何修改,具体在论文里修改了哪里,修改的地方可以视情况在原文中使用高亮、审阅模式、批注等进行标记。
回答格式建议为:「审稿人意见原文 感谢审稿人意见 回答内容。」
The title is too long I suggest shortening. Modified throughout the text according to the comment (Line 20 page 1).Thank you for the title suggested. The precedent version of the title has been replaced becoming... Line 25 page 1… Modified throughout the text according to the comment (Line 20 page 1).
STEP-3: 语言问题,必须修改
审稿人长期进行审稿,对语言用词比较熟悉和关注,审稿人如果对你的语言提出的修改意见,一定要仔细润色,如果自己英语水平不好,务必要找专业人士帮忙润色。
回复时建议按照以下模版进行:
We apologize for the poor language of our manuscript. We worked on the manuscript for a long time and the repeated addition and removal of sentences and sections obviously led to poor readability. We have now worked on both language and readability and have also involved native English speakers for language corrections. We really hope that the flow and language level have been substantially improved.
STEP-4: 不同意?给出理由
如果不同意审稿人的意见,在感谢审稿人意见之后,应该给出足够的理由和结果用以佐证。
而对于无法修改的内容,也要说明其中具体的原因,但是同时你也要表示出你为此做出了什么样的措施来弥补,或者说你的理由足够充分。
表达上可使用:
We politely disagree. / We respectfully disagree.婉转的表述不同意,或者We agree with you that.... however ......
STEP-5: 完整版回复模版以上 4 点是回复时需要重点注意的地方,把它们串联一下就是完整回复模版,如下:
Dear Editor XX and Reviewers Thanks very much for taking your time to review this manuscript. I really appreciate all your comments and suggestions! Please find my itemized responses in below and my revisions/corrections in the re-submitted files.(基本上是套话)
Thanks again! 下面就开始回复文章的审稿意见了,一般首先是回复期刊编辑的整体意见:
SUGGESTIONS FROM EDITOR(注意这一段要把编辑原始的建议粘贴在这里,不能只有回应) Your response to the general comments from the editor 接下来是逐条回应审稿人的建议:
COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR:
Reviewer #1: Response to the questions one by one
Reviewer #2: Response to the questions one by one
最后,再分享一些其他注意事项,也是很多同学在回复审稿人时常遇到的问题:
01-回复时间越快越好?
错!时间不可短,也不能超过 deadline。
首先太短显得草率。原则上,「mini revision」要一周后再回复,「major revision」,回复时间要三周以上。
如果遇到需要数据而你没有的,尽快安排实验或分析,无法按期完成,需要与老板商量斟酌是否需要先与杂志方联系推迟截稿日期。
02-如何优化回复信排版?
建议使用字体、颜色和缩进的变化来区分三种不同的元素:审稿人的意见、你对意见的回应以及你对稿件所做的修改。你可以在答复函的第一部分对这种区分方式进行交代。
03-结论先行,回复以“是”与“否”开始
尽可能回答“是”或“否”。当审稿人是正确的时候,请在回复中说明。
你的目标是向审稿人表明你认真对待了他们的意见,你应该迅速传达你对他们的评论的回应。接着你也可以提供一些背景信息支持你的回复。最后,请记住,在大多数情况下,审稿人都是善意的同事,他们自愿抽出时间帮助确保科学文献中报告的结果的有效性。
我们要正确对待并最大化利用审稿人的审稿意见,让其成为提升我们科研论文质量和未来研究能力的一种助力,而非「绊脚石」!