快捷搜索:  汽车  科技

大砍刀反杀案后续:反杀事件背后细节被挖出 花臂哥涉黑

大砍刀反杀案后续:反杀事件背后细节被挖出 花臂哥涉黑The driver had been in prison at least five times and had served an accumulated imprisonment term of 9.5 years. His past crimes include theft intentional injury as well as picking quarrels and provoking troubles.从曝光的司法判决看,死者刘某某劣迹斑斑前科累累,至少5次被捕,刑期累计达到9年半,涉及到盗窃罪、故意伤害罪、寻衅滋事罪,打碎过别人的鼻梁、刀刺过别人的胸腔。澎湃新闻周三晚针对该事件发布的社论谈及“扫黑除恶”的问题。In an editorial on Wednesday evening thepaper.cn said that “attention must be

8月27日晚,江苏省昆山市一轿车司机持刀追砍电动自行车车主反被砍身亡的刑事案件引起社会广泛关注。

大砍刀反杀案后续:反杀事件背后细节被挖出 花臂哥涉黑(1)

事件引发热议的同时,网上也曝出持刀的轿车司机即被害人刘某某有犯罪前科。

大砍刀反杀案后续:反杀事件背后细节被挖出 花臂哥涉黑(2)

据《新京报》从知情人士处证实,此前,死者刘某某曾多次因抢劫盗窃敲诈等罪获刑。据统计,自2001年至2014年,刘某某至少五次被捕,刑期累计达到9年半。

大砍刀反杀案后续:反杀事件背后细节被挖出 花臂哥涉黑(3)

同时,有网帖提及,刘某某还曾于今年3月获昆山市见义勇为基金会颁发证书。据《扬子晚报》报道,昆山市见义勇为基金会回应称,刘某某曾举报有人贩毒的线索。

大砍刀反杀案后续:反杀事件背后细节被挖出 花臂哥涉黑(4)

澎湃新闻周三晚针对该事件发布的社论谈及“扫黑除恶”的问题。

In an editorial on Wednesday evening thepaper.cn said that “attention must be paid to possible clues to organized criminal gangs behind the case.”

社论称,这起“反杀案”,除了条分缕析正当防卫的定性问题,更要关注背后浓浓的“涉黑”因素,不能就案子谈案子

从曝光的司法判决看,死者刘某某劣迹斑斑前科累累,至少5次被捕,刑期累计达到9年半,涉及到盗窃罪、故意伤害罪、寻衅滋事罪,打碎过别人的鼻梁、刀刺过别人的胸腔。

The driver had been in prison at least five times and had served an accumulated imprisonment term of 9.5 years. His past crimes include theft intentional injury as well as picking quarrels and provoking troubles.

这些资料不是为了说明,刘某某就活该被当街砍死,而是说死者有明显涉黑嫌疑,在侦办此案时,不能单纯将其作为“受害人”。

We do not mean he deserves death but at least he might be involved in organized criminal gangs and he is not simply a “victim” in this case.

今年1月,中共中央、国务院发出《关于开展扫黑除恶专项斗争的通知》,决定在全国开展扫黑除恶专项斗争。8月29日,全国公安机关扫黑除恶专项斗争推进会召开,国务委员、公安部党委书记、部长赵克志表示,要“向黑恶势力犯罪发起凌厉攻势”。

昆山当地的偶然的“反杀案”,背后有没有黑恶势力?目前已有很多涉黑的苗头等待深入挖掘。个案要审理,黑恶势力更要扫除,既要有个案的正义,又要保障社会的安全

The top leadership launched a nationwide crackdown on organized crimes to uproot them and their “protective umbrellas” in January. The court will judge the case while the local police should also strike organized crimes if there are any.

社会舆论与司法公正

目前,社会舆论以支持电动车主者居多。尽管网上呼吁电动车主无罪的声音很高,但案件终究还要回到法治轨道上。

对此,《燕赵都市报》评论称:

办案要靠事实和证据说话,而不能靠社会舆论和主观感情,在这个问题上,因具体细节有待查证,律师等业内人士也存在较大争议。但相关部门不能也不该回避或忽略这种自发的网络舆论

Courts rule cases according to the law and evidence not public opinions. In this case there are still details to be verified and a conclusion won’t be made until they are all clear.

越是舆论高度关注、法理情交织的案件,越需要办案机关拿出勇气和智慧,依法独立公正断案,让人民群众看到公平正义,又看到善恶、美丑及世道人心

同时,该案也给相关部门提了醒:扫黑除恶专项斗争任务艰巨,只有把更多功夫下在平时,才能降低类似极端案例的发生概率。

记者:张周项

编辑:左卓

参考:中国日报双语新闻、澎湃新闻、燕赵都市报

猜您喜欢: